Preliminary Analyses
For ladiess (get a hold of Table 2), the 2 extremely illustrated adult accessory styles were secure attachment (31%; n = 26) and you may fearful-avoidant connection (28.6%; n = 24), when you find yourself for males, many depicted adult attachment styles have been secure (38.5%; letter = 20) and you can dismissing (thirty six.5%; n = 19). It is vital to highlight that the obsessed accessory design is defectively depicted in the men (step three.8%; n = 2), symbolizing fourteen.3% in our decide to try (Letter = 12).
An initial MANOVA, using the Wilk’s test (Rao’s approximation), was performed with the raw scores of the attachment (adult attachment style-secure, dismissing, anxious-preoccupied, and fearful-avoidant) as the dependent variables and with gender, education, and current family situation, as well as their interactions, as the explanatory variables. Education [F(cuatro, 118) = 3.236, p = 0.015], current family situation [F(16, 321) = 1.704, p = 0.045), and the interaction between gender and education [F(twelve, 271) = 2.115, p = 0.016] were found to significantly influence the attachment scores for participants.
A few that-means ANOVAs was basically done to take notice of the matchmaking between the dependent changeable intense an incredible number of this new connection appearance and also the explanatory parameters of training and you will latest loved ones disease, plus the interaction among them. If you find yourself not one of these Aeters was indeed found to be tall. The results show, for example, one members that has a twelfth grade knowledge had been with the a reduction of stressed-possessed accessory build, and is of an increase since it communicates that have most of the loved ones points, in addition to better boost was included in those people members which have an excellent high school knowledge as they are married.
The significant associations between attachment styles were examined further by non-parametric testing (i.e., Kruskal–Wallis test) using a Monte Carlo method with 10,000 simulations and p < 0.05. The findings revealed several significant relationships between attachment scores (K = , p < 0.0001). The Steel–Dwass–Critchlow-Fligner procedure for multiple comparisons revealed that scores for the anxious-preoccupied attachment style were significantly different from the other attachment styles (see Figure 1).
Removed along with her, with the brutal ratings on the mature attachment appearances, the raw results having anxious-obsessed connection styles mostly range from the individuals towards the almost every other connection appearances. A consequent analysis is hence set to determine which of the explanatory details, or no, affected these types of intense scores into the anxious-preoccupied attachment appearance.
An ANOVA was therefore performed to determine the relationship between the explanatory variables of gender, education, and current family situation and the anxious-preoccupied attachment scores. The overall model was significant [F(8, 122) = 2.193, p = 0.032], and only gender was found to significantly influence anxious-preoccupied attachment scores [F(step 1, 129) = 6.176, p = 0.014]. The post-hoc comparisons using the Tukey’s honestly significant difference test indicated that the mean score for females (Mfemale = 3.325, SD = 0.374) was significantly different from the mean score for males (Mmale = 2.625, SD = 0.363). Taken together, these results indicate that women have higher levels of anxious-preoccupied scores for attachment compared with men.
Studies of your Association Between Dysfunctional Practices, Connection Appearance, and you can Demographic Variables
Once the shown inside the Desk step 3, typically the most popular dysfunctional behaviors 
accompanied have been communication (Letter = 102), followed closely by giving point (N = 37) and you may managing practices (letter = 25). Contained in this non-medical shot, other more severe impaired behavior integrated eight dangers, around three injuries, you to definitely possessions ruin, no hostility.
Fearful and you will preoccupied participants was in fact seen to be overrepresented having communications and you can defamation, correspondingly. A maximum of 91.2% (N = 31) off afraid players utilized communications because their impaired conclusion [? ( step 3 ) 2 = 7.98, p = 0.046, V = 0.25], while you are 29% (Letter = 5) off preoccupied users made use of defamation as their dysfunctional behavior [? ( step 3 ) 2 = six.twenty five, p = 0.019, V = 0.22]. Of trying to assist, preoccupied players seem to be prone to discover elite group help, while you are none of the dismissing users proclaimed to inquire of to have assist [? ( step three ) 2 = 8.21, p = 0.042, V = 0.28].
