However, there was uniform and you will convergent medical literary works on the connection concept and also the positive and negative reflexes that the safer and you can insecure looks, correspondingly, trigger in the marriage, zero education have been unearthed that as well looked at new details stated in the this study, exhibiting those dichotomously discriminate the brand new connection build including the fresh new magnitude out-of discrimination. Recognize the team regarding activities you to characterizes all the connection styles and you may appearing and therefore points feel the better fuel out-of discrimination would-be another effects that may suggest look and you will intervention agendas to have couples therapy.
Contained in this sense, the goal of this research was to evaluate whether or not the correspondence, relationship changes, resolution, frequency and you can concentration of problems parameters carry out discriminate people with safer and you can vulnerable connection inside the heterosexual relationships. Ergo, the brand new hypothesis checked-out was your negative telecommunications, actions out of attack and prevention, regularity and you will concentration of disputes variables create define everyone since people with vulnerable accessory, and discover communications, consensus, pleasure, cohesion and marital variations, in addition to contract parameters perform define them due to the fact people with safe attachment styles.
Players
This is a decimal, cross-sectional research that utilizes a detailed and you may explanatory structure. The minimum period of men candidates try 20 while the maximum try 79 (Meters = ; SD = ). The minimum age females professionals is actually 18 and limitation was 76 (Meters = ; SD = ) ( Desk 1).
Tools
1) Sociodemographic survey: The newest survey of one’s sociodemographic attributes of the users try carried away because of a questionnaire with 14 questions that investigated: ages, intimate positioning, place of residence, marital condition, duration of newest relationships, existence of a previous dating, period of past relationship, training, doing work outside the household, work, personal income, quantity of pupils and you can religion.
2) Experience in Close Relationship – Reduced (ECR-R-Brazil) ( Natividade Shiramizu, 2015 Natividade, J. C., Shiramizu, V. K. M. (2015). Uma medida de apego: versao brasileira da Experiences in Close Relationship Scale-Reduzida (ECR-R-Brasil). Psicologia USP, 26(3), 484-494. ): The scale assesses the anxiety and avoidance of attachment factors in the marital relationship. The ECR-R-Brazil has affirmative phrases that respondents must categorize on a seven-point Likert scale that ranges from “strongly agree” to seven “strongly disagree”. The scale has ten items, five on the anxiety factor and five on the avoidance factor. In the analysis of the main components of the items of the ECR-R-Brazil carried out in the study by Natividade and Shiramizu (2015) Natividade, J. C., Shiramizu https://datingranking.net/rate-my-date/, V. K. M. (2015). Uma medida de apego: versao brasileira da Experiences in Close Relationship Scale-Reduzida (ECR-R-Brasil). Psicologia USP, 26(3), 484-494. , with good data adequacy, Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) = 0.80; Bartlett’s sphericity test, ? 2 (66, N = 4.879) = ; p < 0.001. The final model from the confirmatory factor analysis showed an optimal fit, as pointed out in the study: ? 2 = 101.8; Degrees of freedom (df) = 25; p = < 0.001; ? 2 /df = 4.07; Goodness-of-Fit Index (GFI) = 0990; Adjusted Goodness-of-Fit Index (AGFI) = 0.990; Normed Fit Index (NFI) = 0.990; Tucker–Lewis Index (TLI) = 0.990; Comparative Fit Index (CFI) = 0.990; Root Mean Square Error of Approximation (RMSEA) = 0.025; Confidence Interval (CI) = 90%. In this study, the ECR-R-Brazil had a Cronbach's Alpha of 0.64 for men and 0.57 for women.
3) Mosmann, C., Wagner, A good., Sarriera, J. (2008). A qualidade conjugal como preditora dos estilos educativos parentais. Revista Psicologia Lisboa, 22(2), 161-182. Recuperado de- ): The fresh conflict measure was split up into a couple of subscales: in the first, named “conflict-disagreement”, 9 goods are displayed and must end up being assessed towards a half dozen-point Likert size regarding the frequency in which the causes to possess disagreement conveyed took place the past year, anywhere between “almost never” in order to half a dozen “pretty much every date”. In the next subscale, entitled “conflict-aggression”, around three goods are showed speaing frankly about the fresh intensity of issues, this type of need to be reviewed towards the a beneficial Likert measure of five facts anywhere between “never” so you’re able to four “always”. On research to help you adjust the size and style from English so you can Portuguese, an effective Cronbach’s Alpha regarding 0.71 was discover. Within this studies, Cronbach’s opinions were 0.80 for men and you can 0.77 for ladies.
